Legal Opinion

Whirlwind Manufacturing Company v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1965No. 21712PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHITAKER, Senior Judge.

This is an action for the refund of an excise tax, imposed under section 4121 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, as amended by section 112 of the Excise Tax Technical Changes Act of 1958 (P.L. 85-859, 72 Stat. 1275), on “articles of the household type,” including, among other enumerated articles, “Electric direct motor-driven and belt-driven fans and air circulators.”

During the taxable period in question, the appellant manufactured and sold under the brand name of “Sea-Breeze Industrial Fans,” electric belt-driven fans with model numbers A24V, A24E, A30V, A30E, A33V,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. United States v. John B. LevyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  4. United States v. California Portland Cement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  5. Myron A. Anderson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API