Grundy v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 28 — MOTION APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, secs. 1 and 3, art. 9, chap. 83. 4 Bush, 383, Calloway v. Commonwealth. 8 Bush, 378, Hall, &c. v. Commonwealth, &c. 1 Bibb, 192, Grimes v. Butler. 2 J. J. Mar. 416, Thompson v. Buckhannon. 1 Metcalfe, 410, Lane v. Kasey. 1 Duvall, 199, Commonwealth v. Roberts. 1 J. J. Mar. 206. 5 Littell, 19. 16 B. Mon. 556, Cook v. Boyd.
Read the full summary
Case 28 — MOTION APPEAL FROM FRANKLIN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, secs. 1 and 3, art. 9, chap. 83. 4 Bush, 383, Calloway v. Commonwealth. 8 Bush, 378, Hall, &c. v. Commonwealth, &c. 1 Bibb, 192, Grimes v. Butler. 2 J. J. Mar. 416, Thompson v. Buckhannon. 1 Metcalfe, 410, Lane v. Kasey. 1 Duvall, 199, Commonwealth v. Roberts. 1 J. J. Mar. 206. 5 Littell, 19. 16 B. Mon. 556, Cook v. Boyd. CITED Revised Statutes, secs. 1, 2, art. 12, page 268. General Statutes, secs. 1, 2, 3, art. 11, chap. 92. Constitution of Kentucky, art. 2, sec. 37. 2 Metcalfe, 371, Mershon v. Commonwealth. 2…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE COFER
delivered the opinion oe the court.
This was a proceeding by motion in the Franklin Circuit Court, in the name of the commonwealth, against the appellant Grundy, who was sheriff of McCracken County in 1873, and the sureties in his bond for the collection of the public revenue of that year. The proceeding was commenced in 1874, after the General Statutes went into effect, and that it was in all respects in conformity to the requirements of these statutes is not questioned.
It is claimed, however, that the bond was not a statutory bond, and therefore that the remedy prescribed by the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Calloway v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1868
3Cited by3 opinions
- O'Kane v. VinnedgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
- Sellers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
- Shrader v. SemoninCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906