Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hirschman v. Hudson-Athens Ferry Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1929Published

1DissentHasbrouck, J.

In the case at bar there was no pleading of negligent operation of the ferry. The pleading set forth an alleged negligent construction. It constituted the sole issue. The law applicable to the facts at the close of the case as laid down by the court eliminated that issue from the case. The trial justice submitted two other questions of negligence and made issues of them in order to save the parties another trial. A commendable effort but not warranted as I think by the practice. (Beldner v. Schendler Realty Co., 220 App. Div. 17.) The practice which quite universally prevails at trials where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deyo v. . MorssNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Livingston v. LivingstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Beldner v. Schendler Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API