Legal Opinion
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Chen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 7, 1992No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: The disclosure provisions of the CPLR apply equally to nonresidents, and it was proper for the court to direct that defendant’s examination be held in Onondaga County, where the action is pending (see, CPLR 3110 [1]; Levine v St. Luke’s Hosp. Ctr., 109 AD2d 694, 695; Kahn v Rodman, 91 AD2d 910, 911). Although defendant, a resident of Taiwan, is required to travel several thousand miles, much of his burden is self-imposed. Defendant was served with an order to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kahn v. RodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Levine v. St. Luke's Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- United Refrigerator Co. v. RoseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hoffman v. KrausAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Dec v. Auburn Enlarged School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Gabriel v. Johnston's L.P. Gas Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Gabriel v. Johnston's L.P. Gas Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Mount Vernon Fire Insurance v. LundyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995