Legal Opinion

James Harland Birdwell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 11, 1965No. 19564PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge:

James Harland Birdwell appeals from the denial, in part, of his motion made pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1958) to vacate the sentence imposed upon him.

On September 10, 1962, while represented by counsel, Birdwell pleaded guilty to an information charging a violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (1958). On September 18, 1962, he was committed to the custody of the Attorney General pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 4208(b) (1958), for imprisonment for the maximum period authorized by law (five years), and for a study and report as described in section 4208(b) and (c).

On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bishop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Isadore Smith v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  5. Robert Wilburn Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1963

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fanklin Delano Floyd v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Gerald L. Stone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. Raymond MirandaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  4. Carl Jess Hanson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API