Legal Opinion

Scarlett v. . Norwood

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1894PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This was a civil ACTION, heard before Bynum, J., upon complaint and demurrer at August Term, 1894, of OraNGE Superior Court, sounding in damages for loss of services of the infant daughter of the plaintiff, and for damages by reason of the criminal connection, seduction, enticing, debauching and degrading said daughter, thereby damaging said plaintiff, and for medical care, nursing and attendance upon said daughter during her illness, as well as for the services rendered the…

Read the full summary

This was a civil ACTION, heard before Bynum, J., upon complaint and demurrer at August Term, 1894, of OraNGE Superior Court, sounding in damages for loss of services of the infant daughter of the plaintiff, and for damages by reason of the criminal connection, seduction, enticing, debauching and degrading said daughter, thereby damaging said plaintiff, and for medical care, nursing and attendance upon said daughter during her illness, as well as for the services rendered the said Norwood by said daughter. The demurrer was sustained, and plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

This was an action brought by the father, alleging seduction of his infant daughter, loss of her services, expenses of her illness, her death, injury in his affections, etc. It is the common-law action of seduction, and we know of no statute depriving the father of his remedy in such cases. If an action on facts can be maintained for wrongful act causing death, under the provisions of The Code, sec. 1498, it could be brought only by the personal representative, as is rightly contended by defendant's counsel. But the plaintiff is entitled to any relief to which the facts stated in his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bottoms v. Seaboard & Roanoke RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  2. McNeill v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Hood v. . SudderthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  4. Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1860
  5. Hoover v. . PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burcl v. North Carolina Baptist Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Abbott Ex Rel. Abbott v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  3. Snider v. Newell.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Khalifa v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Morris v. BruneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API