State v. Said
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
The parties and the court of appeals have focused on whether the facts of this case satisfy the particular requirements of Evid.R. 807. We do not reach those issues, because two fundamental errors preclude a proper review of the application of that rule in this case.
I
The trial court erred when it failed to record the competency hearing of the five-year-old granddaughter. Crim.R. 22 clearly provides: “In serious offense cases all proceedings shall be recorded.” (Emphasis added.) Although “proceeding” is not defined under Crim.R. 22, it is generally defined as “[a]ll the steps or measures…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BostonOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. FrazierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. WallaceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Schulte v. SchulteOhio Supreme Court · 1994
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. MuttartOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KnuffOhio Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. SilvermanOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. ConnerOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. LandinghamOhio Court of Appeals · 2021
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.