CORTESE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN A. CORTESE : CIVIL ACTION : v. : NO. 18-3437 : COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL : SECURITY : MEMORANDUM KEARNEY, J. May 27, 2020 Social Security claimant John A. Cortese persuaded us to remand the Commissioner’s order denying him benefits because the Commissioner and the President did not properly appoint the administrative law judge who decided his case as required by the Appointments Clause. We remanded based on strong policy arguments opposed by the Commissioner who cited a string of cases supporting his theory Mr.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lucia v. SECSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Scarborough v. PrincipiSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Andrew Cirko v. Commissioner Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
- Morgan v. PerryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.