Legal Opinion

Tuttle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 27, 1895No. Nos. 9247—9248—(121-122)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeals by defendant in each case from, an order of the district court for Nobles county, P. E. Brown, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

START, C. J.2

The subject-matter of these actions is a strip of land 100 feet in width over and along the S. W. \ of section 8, in township 102, R. 39, in Nobles county, which for many years has been in the possession of the defendant, and used by it as a part of its right of way.

The plaintiff Amos E. Tuttle claims to own and be entitled to the possession of so much of such right of way as is upon the west half of such quarter section. He holds the patent title to such west half, which had its inception in a homestead entry made on November 17, 1871. A previous declaratory statement had been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Coleman v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  2. Simonson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
  3. Radke v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lawver v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  2. Lawver v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API