Borland v. Pacific Meat & Packing Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.
This action was instituted by respondent, as plaintiff, to recover for personal injuries received as the result of a collision between a truck, owned and operated in the business of appellant, and an automobile, owned by the defendants Thompson; respondent himself occupying the position of an innocent bystander. The cause was tried to a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of defendants Thompson and against the appellant in the sum of $8,000. A judgment was entered on the verdict and this appeal followed.
Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict, nor…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. PutnamSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- McCaffrey v. SchwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Bourke v. Butte Electric & Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905
- Seeherman v. Wilkes-Barre Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Colusa Parrot Mining & Smelting Co. v. MonahanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McNair v. BergerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Southgate v. Eastern Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927
- State v. HinkleyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Henry Du Bois Sons Co. v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.