Novak v. Capital Management & Development Corp.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia was presented to the court, and briefed and argued by counsel. It is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the appeal be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Generally, the jurisdiction of courts of appeals is limited to appeals from “final decisions of the district courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 1291; see Cambridge Holdings Group, Inc. v. Federal Ins. Co., 489 F.3d 1356, 1359 (D.C.Cir.2007); Outlaw v. Airtech Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc., 412 F.3d 156, 159 (D.C.Cir.2005). The finality of a decision in a case…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Outlaw v. Airtech Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Cambridge Holdings Group, Inc. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Viola Chvala v. D. C. Transit System, Inc., Ann Baker v. D. C. Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Miguel Pons v. Republic of CubaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
4Cited by2 opinions
- Novak v. CAPITAL MANAGEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT CORP.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- iTalent Corporation v. KothaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025