State v. Mower

POMEROY, Justice.

This Defendant-Appellant’s 1 appeal raises three issues, all of which we find to be without merit.

These are:(a) Is the indictment sufficient to charge the Defendant with violation of 17 M.R.S.A. § 754, breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny ?(b) Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the conclusion there was a “break" and “entry” into the building with intent to commit larceny?(c) Is the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction?

The indictment in this case charges that the Defendant:

“ * * * a building owned by B. Went-worth Greenleaf there situate, in which…