Decker v. Zonic
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Randy Scott Decker, et al., No. CV-23-08077-PCT-DWL 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Omer Zonic, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment or, in the 16 alternative, motion to dismiss. (Doc. 30.) Plaintiffs did not respond. For the following 17 reasons, the motion is granted. 18 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 19 In February 2023, Plaintiffs—who were then represented by counsel—filed a 20 complaint in Mohave County Superior Court. (Doc. 1-3.) The complaint asserts a 21…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Everett v. Thomas Capital Investments (In Re Pacific Thomas Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018