Legal Opinion

Winfield v. Keefe

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 20, 2019No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-11051-WGYPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

YOUNG, D.J.

"Qualified immunity attaches when an official's conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known," City of Escondido, Cal. v. Emmons, --- U.S. ----, 139 S.Ct. 500, 503, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2019) (quoting Kisela v. Hughes, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1148, 1152, 200 L.Ed.2d 449 (2018) (per curiam) ); Alfano v. Lynch, 847 F.3d 71, 75 (1st Cir. 2017). "The doctrine's prophylactic sweep is broad: it leaves unprotected only those officials who, 'from an objective standpoint, should have known that their conduct was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wilson v. LayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Brosseau v. HaugenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Montel v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
  2. Armstrong v. White Winston Select Asset Funds LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API