Legal Opinion
Carlton v. St. Barnabas Hospital
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 26, 2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Third-party defendants made a prima facie showing — based on hospital records, deposition testimony and the affirmations of experts — that their treatment of plaintiffs late husband comported with good and accepted medical practice. Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, the emergency medical physician’s opinions were not conclusory (cf. Wasserman v Carella, 307 AD2d 225, 226 [2003]). In addition, plaintiff failed to preserve her argument that third-party defendants and their experts relied on inadmissible evidence (see Pirraglia v CCC Realty NY Corp., 35 AD3d 234, 235 [2006]), and we decline to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wong v. GoldbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Wasserman v. CarellaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Pirraglia v. CCC Realty NY Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Altmann v. MoleadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tomeo v. BecciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Lyons v. DeNiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Lyons v. DeNiseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Viera v. KhasdanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Ward v. Lincoln Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.