Legal Opinion

State v. . Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 6, 1906PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER and CONNOR, JJ., dissenting. The evidence tends to show that the deceased was a deputy sheriff and had a warrant for the arrest of the prisoner for carrying concealed weapons. Deceased approached prisoner for the (742) purpose of effecting his arrest, and some conversation ensued, the prisoner finally agreeing to give bond for his appearance. The prisoner, the deceased and others started to the office in the feed store of one Engel for the purpose of signing the bond. Hilton, the deputy sheriff, sat down at the table to write the bond, and while thus engaged the prisoner escaped from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Horner.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. Turnage.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  3. State v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. . PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  2. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. State v. PayneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. . BrooksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API