Legal Opinion
Jim Beam Brands Co. v. Beamish & Crawford Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 19, 1991No. 1148, Docket 90-7994PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEARSE, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Beamish & Crawford Ltd. (“Beamish & Crawford” or “B & C”) appeals from a final judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Richard Owen, Judge, in favor of plaintiff Jim Beam Brands Co. (“Jim Beam”) on its complaint alleging, inter alia, trademark infringement and false designation of origin, in violation of the Lanham Act (the “Lanham Act” or “Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 1051 et seq. (1988), and state-law claims of trademark dilution and false advertising. The district court, granting summary judgment, permanently enjoined B & C…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Christopher J. Farrell v. Corey Burke and Gregory Freeman, Docket No. 05-0169 CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Gruner + Jahr USA Publishing v. Meredith Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Metromedia Co. v. FugazyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Hormel Foods Corporation v. Jim Henson Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Leroy Gilbert v. Anthony M. Frank, in His Capacity as Postmaster General of the United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.