Legal Opinion
Clausen v. de Medina
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 20, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 51 Vroom 634.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Voorhees, J.
The Supreme Court sustained the conviction of the plaintiff in error, had before the recorder of Bergen township, Hudson county, upon a complaint made that “being the driver of a heavy farm wagon and driving for business, and not for pleasure, on the Hudson county boulevard, and not being on said boulevard to deliver or receive its loading and being ordered to leave and drive off said boulevard at the nearest cross street refused” to do so contrary to section 9 of the rules adopted by the boulevard commission (controlling the road under…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Whyte v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Smallwood v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1927
- Starego v. SoboloskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Barnes v. Essex County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.