Legal Opinion
Notz v. Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 7, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00769Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT MICA NOTZ, Plaintiff, v. No. 3:19-cv-0769 (JAM) CONNECTICUT COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS AND OPPORTUNITIES, Defendant. ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiff Mica Notz is a non-attorney advocate who has represented many people in proceedings before the Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities (“CHRO”), the defendant in this action. The CHRO is a state agency that investigates and enforces alleged violations of anti-discrimination laws in conjunction with its federal counterpart, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Sykes v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Lundy v. Catholic Health System of Long Island Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.