Legal Opinion

Daves v. Dall. Cnty.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided September 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 3:18-CV-0154-NPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David C. Godbey, United States District Judge

This Order addresses Plaintiffs Shannon Daves, Shakena Walston, Erriyah Banks, Destinee Tovar, Petroba Michieko, and James Thompson's motion for preliminary injunction [3]. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiffs' motion and issues the Preliminary Injunction filed contemporaneously with this Order. The Court has also granted Plaintiffs' motion for class certification [2] in a separate order. The preliminary injunction shall apply to the class the Court certified in that Order.

I. ORIGINS OF THE DISPUTE

This case is about Dallas…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Peterson v. City of Fort Worth, Tex.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daves v. Dallas CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  2. Little v. DoguetCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
  3. Booth v. Galveston CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2019
  4. Daves v. Dallas County TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  5. Little v. DoguetCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API