California University of PA v. B. Schackner and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY
JUDGE McCULLOUGH
The thoughtful and well-written majority recognizes, as did the Office of Open Records (OOR), that the affidavit and privilege log submitted by California. University of Pennsylvania (University) are insufficient to show that the withheld documents satisfy the .noncriminal investigation and predecisional deliberations exemptions from disclosure, and, also, fail to establish that they are protected under the attorney-client privilege. Nonetheless, the majority remands to the OOR to conduct in camera review- of Document Nos. 56-58, 119,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Office of the Governor v. ScolforoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Joe v. Prison Health Services, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Pennsylvania State Police v. MullerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. MurphyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011