Legal Opinion

Paulling v. Marshall

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 15, 1872PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court of Perry. Tried before Hon. Milton J. Sarpcld. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, C. J.

The appellees, in the court below, demurred to appellant’s complaint, -which being sustained, appellant excepted to the decision of the court, and thereupon took a non-suit, and appeals to this court, under section 2759, Revised Code, to have the decision of the court below revised and the non-suit set aside.

We had occasion to construe said section at the present term, in the case of Darden v. James. In that case we held, that the right to appeal to this court to have a non-suit set aside, is given by said section, and as the right depended wholly upon said section, it was to be confined and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hurst v. Bell & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  2. Rogers's Administrator v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874
  3. Mathis v. OatesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  4. Amerson v. Montgomery & Mobile RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API