Legal Opinion

Altizer v. Paderick

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided January 25, 1978No. 76-2182PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant a state prisoner, complains that his removal as an inmate counselor by the prison officials, without a fact finding hearing, was violative of his due process rights. The district court dismissed his action and we affirm.

It is well settled that federal courts do not occupy “the role of super wardens of state penal institutions” (Cooper v. Riddle (4th Cir. 1976) 540 F.2d 731, 732), and “do not sit to supervise state prisons” (Meachum v. Fano (1976) 427 U.S. 215, 229, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 2540, 49 L.Ed.2d 451). In *813particular, the classifications and work assignments of prisoners in such…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Jesse A. X. Cooper v. Walter M. Riddle, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  3. Chapman v. PlagemanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1976

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Ronald Newsom Hasan Sharif Eddie J. McMillan and Donald Wolverton v. Steve Norris, Commissioner Michael Dutton, Warden and David HindmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  2. Michael Ray Ingram v. Marilyn J. Papalia and Chase RivelandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. Dawson v. KendrickDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1981
  4. Gholson v. MurryDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  5. Pierce v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1996

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API