Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Blind
Indiana Supreme Court
From Benton Circuit Court; J. T. Saunderson, Judge. Action by Charles O. Blind against The Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Bailway Company and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant named appeals.
1Concurrence
Concurring Opinion.
Morris, J.
7
It is urged by appellant that the act of the General Assembly of Indiana passed February 27, 1905
(Acts 1905 p. 58, §§3918-3920 Burns 1914), is void because in conflict with §10 of Art. 1, of the Federal Constitution, and certain provisions of the 14th amendment to the Federal Constitution. This claim is unfounded. Adams Express Co. v. Croninger (1913), 226 U. S. 491, 33 Sup. Ct. 148, 57 L. Ed. 314, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 257, and cases cited; Hirth-Krause Co. v. Cohen (1912), 177 Ind. 1, 97 N. E. 1, Ann. Cas. 1914 C 708; Cooley, Const. Lim. (7th ed.) 555, 556;…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.