United States v. Jason Simmons
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLE, Chief Judge.
During Jason Simmons’s criminal trial for drug conspiracy, the government moved to exclude three of Simmons’s co-defendants from the courtroom during the testimony of one of its witnesses. The government argued that, due to certain comments made by Simmons and other individuals outside the courtroom, the presence of the three co-defendants might make the witness feel uncomfortable and intimidated even though the government conceded that none of the statements were threatening and that it did not know whether they were made by any of the three co-defendants it sought…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Presley v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- State v. GarrettOhio Supreme Court · 2022
- Terrence Williams v. Sherry BurtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
- People v. RadfordIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.