Legal Opinion

Dahr v. Guardsmark Security

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided December 20, 2007No. I.C. NO. 433640Published

1Opinion of the Court

Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding good grounds to receive further evidence, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence, reopens the record for receipt of additional evidence.

The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes as matters of law the following, which were entered into by the parties at the hearing before the Deputy Commissioner as:

STIPULATIONS

1. This claim arises from an admittedly compensable injury plaintiff sustained on March 13, 2004.

2. All parties are properly before the Industrial Commission, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pittman v. International Paper Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Keel v. H & v. INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Cummins v. BCCI Construction EnterprisesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API