Legal Opinion

Southern Pac. R. v. Groeck

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California

Decided May 13, 1895No. 347PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This was a suit by the Southern Pacific Railroad Company against Otto Groeck and others to establish the complainant's ownership of certain land, and compel a conveyance thereof. Defendants demurred to the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

ROSS, Circuit Judge.

The land in controversy having been patented to the defendant Groeck under the pre-emption laws of the United States, the complainant, claiming to be entitled to it by virtue of a congressional grant, seeks by this suit to obtain a decree that the title conveyed by the patent is held in trust for it, to compel the conveyance thereof to the complainant, and to enjoin the defendants from asserting any title thereunder. The grant under Avhich the complainant claims the land is that of July 27, 1866 (14 Stat. 292), by which, among other things, the Southern Pacific Railroad…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Caha v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Speidel v. HenriciSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Van Wyck v. KnevalsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Buttz v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lyons Milling Co. v. Goffe & Carkener, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
  2. Kithcart v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1937
  3. Fletcher v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  4. Murphy v. BjelikOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Hutton v. Joseph Bancroft & Sons Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API