Legal Opinion

City of Newberg v. Warren Construction Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1929Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

(279 Pac. 644.)

BELT, J.

Counsel for defendants say the most “colossal blunder” made in our original opinion was in directing' that the expenses of the sale should be deducted before prorating proceeds of the sale to the contractors. We are more charitable. It is mildly suggested that if any mistake was committed it occurred when the contractors refused to accept the deeds tendered by the city. The city had one sale under the provisions of its charter. It is now compelled by reason of the defendants to have another. Common sense, as well as equity, dictates who should…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dennis v. City of McMinnvilleOregon Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Newberg v. Warren Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API