Legal Opinion

Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Gray

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 3, 1915No. 232PublishedCited by 14 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. The facts, which involve the validity of a judgment for damages for personal injuries, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

delivered, the opinion of the court.

This is an action for personal injuries. The plaintiff, Gray, was a hostler at Antigo, Wisconsin, having various duties as to receiving and preparing engines for departure, including the emptying of their ashes into the cinder pit and seeing that the coals in the pit were wet down. Just before the accident he had visited'the cinder pit, to see' whether the cinder pit man was doing his work, and had walked northward a short distance along a path between the track and a coal shed to a point opposite a rest house where he would await his next call to duty. He…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kansas City Western Railway Co. v. McAdowSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Jolly's AdministratrixCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  3. Milburn v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. Thrift Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API