Legal Opinion
Figueroa v. Capital One, N.A.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 16, 2020No. 3:18-cv-00692Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JACOB FIGUEROA and MARY Case No.: 18cv692 JM(BGS) JACKSON, on behalf of themselves and 11 all other similarly situated, ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR Plaintiffs, PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 13 v. CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 14 CAPITAL ONE, N.A., 15 Defendant. 16 17 Presently before the court is Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Approval 18 of Class Action Settlement. A telephonic hearing on the motion was held on June 8, 2020. 19 For the reasons set forth on the record and as explained in more…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- David Hanon v. Dataproducts Corporation Jack C. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- In Re Mego Financial Corporation Securities Litigation Christopher Dunleavy A. Peyser v. Michael Nadler v. Robert Nederlander Jerome J. Cohen Herbert B. Hirsch Wilbur L. Ross, Jr. Deloitte & ToucheCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- 29 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1473, 30 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 33,064 the Officers for Justice, and Jesse J. Byrd v. The Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco, United States of America v. The City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.