Commonwealth v. Alphas
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1ConcurrenceFried, J.
(concurring, with whom Lynch, J., joins). On the ground that the judge’s failure to instruct in accordance with the law did not create a substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice, the court spares the victim the further terror of a retrial. I disagree only with the court’s description of what the standard of substantial risk of a miscarriage of justice means and with the instructions it issues as to the application of that standard in future cases.
The defendant has had a trial in which his guilt was determined according to rules of law in which he himself acquiesced. In the terminology of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sawyer v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.