Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Sampel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 18, 2005Published

1Concurrence

Hurlbutt, J. (concurring).

I respectfully concur in the result only. I agree with the majority that County Court erred in precluding defendant from introducing evidence of a statement made by the complaining witness, defendant’s former girlfriend, to her brother. On cross-examination, the complaining witness denied that she had “put [defendant] in jail” in order to gain *1025possession of a vehicle owned by defendant but titled in her name. In an offer of proof, defendant tendered the testimony of the brother of the complaining witness that she had told him in the presence of two other persons that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. People v. MateoNew York Court of Appeals · 2004

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API