Legal Opinion

Tigler v. Peskin

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward J. Greenfield, J.

Petitioners in this special proceeding for corporate dissolution pursuant to section 1104 of the Business Corporation Law ask this court for provisional relief by way of a declaratory judgment pendente lite.

The parties are three equal shareholders of the firm of Harvard, Peskin & Edrick, Inc., an advertising agency. Their shareholders’ agreement requires that major corporate changes be done only on unanimous approval. Tigler and Edrick are desirous of consolidating the corporation with a larger agency. Respondent Peskin is resolutely opposed.

Petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boulevard Gardens Tenants Action Committee, Inc. v. Boulevard Gardens Housing Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State Division of Human Rights v. New York State PoliceNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Weber v. R. O. SidneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963
  4. Weber v. SidneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API