Legal Opinion

Jones v. Van Epps

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1845PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by plaintiff for a rule or order requiring the defendant to pay a taxed bill of costs.—A judgment was perfected in favor of Henry Jones against the defendant Van Epps, on the 9th July, 1836, in this court, on a report of referees for $157*29 damages and costs.

Read the full summary

Motion by plaintiff for a rule or order requiring the defendant to pay a taxed bill of costs.—A judgment was perfected in favor of Henry Jones against the defendant Van Epps, on the 9th July, 1836, in this court, on a report of referees for $157*29 damages and costs. Van Epps moved to set aside the report of the referees, which motion was denied at July term, 1838. On the 19th July, 1838, plaintiff’s attorney had his costs taxed at $76*67, for opposing that motion, on due notice. On the 23d July, 1838, Van Epps was served personally with a copy of the rule denying the motion to set aside the…

1Opinion of the Court

Beardsley, Justice.

Held that. the delay was too great, to open the matter now, the motion on that ground must be denied.

Decision.—Motion denied, without costs.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Whipple v. WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API