Legal Opinion

Caudle v. Eckles

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 12, 1940PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Stanley, Commissioner

Affirming.

The court is called upon to construe the term “legal representatives” in relation to a devise of land in remainder. The construction determines whether it was a vested or contingent interest. If the former, then the appellants never acquired title since their immediate predecessor had power to convey and did so. If he had a contingent interest, then his conveyance was ineffectual and appellants are successors in title to a substantial interest in 400 acres of land.

When J. R. Caudle died in 1911, he was survived by his widow and one son, T.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  2. Turner v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
  3. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Bair's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Jones v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. Curry's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Milner v. DudreyNevada Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API