Caudle v. Eckles
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Stanley, Commissioner
Affirming.
The court is called upon to construe the term “legal representatives” in relation to a devise of land in remainder. The construction determines whether it was a vested or contingent interest. If the former, then the appellants never acquired title since their immediate predecessor had power to convey and did so. If he had a contingent interest, then his conveyance was ineffectual and appellants are successors in title to a substantial interest in 400 acres of land.
When J. R. Caudle died in 1911, he was survived by his widow and one son, T.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tucker v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- Turner v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837
- Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
- Bair's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Jones v. ThomassonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ward v. Curry's Ex'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Milner v. DudreyNevada Supreme Court · 1961