Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Anrecht v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 24, 1950No. Civ. 17515PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.

The public administrator appeals from a judgment (1) denying him letters of administration with will annexed and (2) granting letters testamentary to Drury D. Dixon, the son of decedent.

Testatrix left a holographic will in words and figures as follows:

“120 W. Claude St.

Compton, Calif.

Jan. 25 1947

I, Mattie Clary, makes this statement concerning the disposition of my home and contents.

Located at 120-W. Claude at Compton, Calif.

I give my home and its contents to my son Drury D. Dixon to do with as he pleases.

This is my gift to him and his family—his address is at present

1540 N W 8th St

Miami Fla.

t…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of PeabodyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. In re Estate of BedellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Henderson v. CuttingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. In re Estate of TwombleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Gorner v. TrueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ford v. CawthonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Rowley v. Grand Lodge of Iowa of Ancient, Free & Accepted MasonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. McQuarrie v. KuttlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API