Legal Opinion

Terry v. Hubbell

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided August 15, 1960No. File 86804PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouse, J.

This is an action for libel. The relevant circumstances established by the evidence and pleadings are as follows: In 1955, the plaintiff became a director and the president of the Seymour Manufacturing Company and continued to hold these positions until October, 1957. His salary was $42,000 a year. At a stockholders’ meeting held at that time, there was a marked division of opinion among the stockholders concerning the management of the affairs of the corporation, and a majority of the stock was voted for a slate of directors which did not include the plaintiff. He thereby became ineligible…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bacon v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Urban v. Hartford Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Charles Parker Co. v. Silver City Crystal Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. Proto v. Bridgeport Herald CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  5. Denver Public Warehouse Co. v. HollowaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Elias v. YoungkenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
  3. Skopp v. First Federal SavingsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Vanover v. Kansas City Life Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Pirre v. Printing Developments, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API