Legal Opinion
Beerbower v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided September 13, 1984No. Civ. A. 84CV-7218-AAPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOINER, District Judge.
Defendants, the United States, the Internal Revenue Commissioner, Bruce A. Set-tell and W. Bird, move to dismiss this case and for an award of attorneys’ fees and costs. The issues have been considered pursuant to Rule 78, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted.
Plaintiff challenges the withholding of federal income taxes from his wages. He sues the United States; the IRS Commissioner; two IRS employees; his employer, General Motors Hydra-Matic Division; and two General Motors…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- District of Columbia v. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Joshua Stonecipher v. William E. BrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Campbell v. Amax Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Otworth v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1985
- Beerbower v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Donald R. Kostyu v. Ford Motor Company R.F. Hanna J. Haine T. Egan Taisha Turner Bruce Settel and R.S. BarmoreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- Harris v. Donley's, IncorporatedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Scroggins 166286 v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2022