Legal Opinion · Dissent

Santiago v. Craigbrand Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 28, 2000Published

1DissentMazzarelli, J.

The infant plaintiff received $140,000 in settlement of a personal injury action for lead paint poisoning. The parties did not allocate any portion of this amount to reimburse past medical expenses. Contrary to the majority’s position, I would find that pursuant to the holding in Baker v Sterling (39 NY2d 397), Social Services Law § 104 (2) precludes DSS from recouping its $12,857.06 Medicaid lien from the settlement. Social Services Law § 104 (2) provides.: “No right of action shall accrue against a person under twenty-*35one years of age by reason of the assistance or care granted to him…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cricchio v. PennisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Baker v. SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Calvanese v. CalvaneseNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Gold v. United Health Services Hospitals, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. McClenahan v. FarberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API