Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

O'KELLY v. Willig Freight Lines

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 28, 1977No. Civ. 49153Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

JEFFERSON (Bernard), J.

I concur in part and dissent in part.

The majority opinion poses the issue before us as one dealing with the power of a trial court in an action tried under the doctrine of comparative negligence, pronounced in Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 804 [119 Cal.Rptr. 858, 532 P.2d 1226], to grant a new trial limited to the issue of apportionment of damages. I disagree with this statement of the issue presented in the case at bench because, in my opinion, the trial court did not purport to grant a new trial limited to the sole issue of apportionment of damages. As I…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mercer v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Scala v. Jerry Witt & Sons, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Miller v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API