Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Schmid

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 2007No. 06-268, 06-270PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Jusfice.

[T1] Mike Schmid appeals the judgment entered in favor of his brother, Pat Schmid. 1 He contends that the trial court improperly excluded much of the evidence he offered in support of his version of the terms of an oral agreement between the two brothers. We agree that the trial court abused its discretion in excluding the evidence, and so we reverse the judgment and remand the case for a new trial.

ISSUES

[12] These issues are presented for our review:

1. Whether the district court abused its discretion in excluding evidence corroborating Mike's theory of the case;

2. Whether the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ShraderWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  2. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Albany County School District No. 1Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Skinner v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Stauffer Chemical Co. v. CurryWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steven F. LudlowWyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Glenn v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Counts v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API