Legal Opinion

Electro-Dynamic Co. v. The Electron

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 8, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In Admiralty, Libel for balance of price of repairs and supplies. Cross libel to recover damages for breach, of the contract under which the repairs were made. A stay of proceedings under the original libel until security was given for the damages claimed under the cross libel was heretofore allowed. 48 Fed. Eep. 689.

1Opinion of the Court

BEOWN, District Judge.

The above libel was filed to recover payment of the balance of the contract price for supplying to the yacht Electron certain electrical storage batteries, and other work and material, in the spring of 1891. The answer alleges that the batteries were* designed to increase the élecMeal motor power of the yacht, and to enable her to attain a certain increased speed, and that the libelant represented that this could be obtained by increasing the number of cells and rewinding the motor; and that by such changes she would make from 1,400 to 2,000 revolutions of her wheel per…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Consumers' Gas Co. of Danville v. American Electric Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
  3. Carman v. TrudeNew York Supreme Court · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The AdaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
  2. General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API