Legal Opinion

Hall v. National Fire Insurance

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1905PublishedCited by 16 opinions

FROM KNOX. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County.— Joseph W. Sneed, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

Complainants’ bill states the following case: .

On the 6th day of September, 1904, the defendant company issued to the complainants a policy containing among other things, the following provisions: “The *515National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford, Conn., in consideration of tbe stipulations herein named, and of $19.38 premium, does insure Hall & Hawkins, for the term of one year from the 6th day of September, 1904, at noon, to the 6th day of September, 1905, at noon, against all direct loss or damage by fire, except as herein provided, to an amount not exceeding $1,000, on the following…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
  2. Mitchell v. Potomac InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. LaForce v. Williams City Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Transatlantic Fire Insurance v. DorseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1881
  5. Heuer v. North Western National Insurance Co. of MilwaukeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1893

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Maness v. Life & Casualty InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Delametter v. the Home Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Tierney v. Occidental Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  5. Githens v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API