Covillion v. Alsop
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Stephen Giggey and James Forrester. (Docket # 33). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ Motion.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
A federal court grants summary judgment “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c). The Court must…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.