Legal Opinion
Lowsley-Williams v. North River Ins. Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 3, 1995No. Civ. 93-5434 (WGB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BASSLER, District Judge:
The plaintiffs, Peter George Hoole Lowsley-Williams (“Lowsley-Williams”), individually and as a representative of certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”) and nineteen London market insurance companies, brought an action pursuant to the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201, seeking a declaration of the rights and obligations of the parties under certain facultative reinsurance contracts. Plaintiffs additionally seek monetary damages for breach of contract. Plaintiffs allege diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2). Defendants move to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Carden v. Arkoma AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Advani Enterprises, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds and Syndicate 735 at Lloyds of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Nos. 97-5735, 97-5736Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Corfield v. Dallas Glen Hills LPCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.