Legal Opinion

Goodman v. Goldstein

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 30, 1962No. 62-250PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, TILLMAN, Chief Judge.

The appellant was plaintiff in the trial court and the appellee was defendant. The plaintiff appeals an order dismissing her complaint with prejudice. We reverse.

The complaint alleged false and malicious statements which were defamatory per se made during the progress of a trial in the Small Claims Court in Dade County. It was specifically asserted that the alleged defamatory statements were not relevant or material to the matter being heard in the Small Claims Court.

The allegations were sufficient to state a cause of action under the rule set forth in Myers v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Myers v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1907
  2. Taylor v. Alropa Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. St. Paul F. & M. Ins. Co. v. Icard, Merrill, Cullis & TimmDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  2. Stryker v. Barbers Super Markets, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Delacruz v. Peninsula State BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Matthews v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API