Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 2010No. ED 93884Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Bryan McDaniel appeals from the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the piinciples of law applicable to this case would serve no jui'-ispnidential pux-pose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their infoi-mation only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. CoxMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. State v. McDanielMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API