Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 2005No. 2D04-5231PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA), review denied, 888 So.2d 621 (Fla.2004). After this court held in Boyd that a claim of vindictive sentencing is not cognizable in a motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), the Fifth District in Johnson v. State, 877 So.2d 795 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004), reversed a circuit court order denying a rule 3.800(a) motion and remanded for consideration of the claim of vindictive sentencing raised in the motion. We certify direct conflict with Johnson.

Affirmed; conflict certified.

KELLY,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  2. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API