Heaston v. Martinez
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
COWLEY, District Judge.
Two cases in replevin brought by the respective plaintiffs-respondents, to recover a Pontiac automobile in the one case and a Buick automobile in the other. Plaintiffs recovered judgment in the lower court and defendants-appellants, appeal. The cases were tried separately but were combined for argument on appeal as the facts are similar and the questions of law identical, the sole issue being one of estoppel.
The parties submitted their respective cases to the trial court, sitting without a jury, upon written stipulated facts. Without narrating the stipulated facts we…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Al's Auto Sales v. MoskowitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- Deahl v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Harrison v. Auto Securities Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
- Jones v. Commercial Investment TrustUtah Supreme Court · 1924
- L. B. Motors, Inc. v. PrichardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bordman Investment Co. v. Peoples Bank of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Clanton's Auto Auction Sales, Inc. v. YoungSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
- Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithNevada Supreme Court · 1960
- Valley Motor Co. v. RallsOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Clearfield State Bank v. Peters Plumbing & Heating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1960
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.