Legal Opinion

In re the Probate of the Will of Cohrssen

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 5, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, 8.

In this uncontested probate proceeding a will bearing date December 17, 1952 and a codicil thereto bearing date May 8, 1957 have been offered for probate. The will was executed within this jurisdiction. The codicil, an unwitnessed instrument executed in the German language, was prepared by notary Emil Arndt of Heppemheim, Germany and was executed by testator under his supervision. The proof establishes the due execution of the will. The proof of the codicil is complicated, however, by the circumstance that the original instrument is on file in Germany and under the laws of…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1962
  2. In re the Estate of CarterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API